Table of contents
Mazda CX 30 vs CX 5 – Dimensions, Interior, Reliability & Price
Choosing between the Mazda CX-30 and the Mazda CX-5 can be a challenging decision, with both SUVs offering distinct advantages and features. In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll explore dimensions, interior features, reliability, and pricing to help you make a choice between these two outstanding models.
Whether you crave speed, luxury, or a bit of both, understanding the differences in trims, pricing, and specifications will guide your decision-making process.
Mazda CX 30 vs CX 5 – Dimensions
In terms of size, the CX-5 is slightly larger than the CX-30, especially in rear legroom where the CX-5 provides 39.6 inches compared to the CX-30’s 36.3 inches.
However, headroom, shoulder room, and hip room are comparable within a two-inch range. The ground clearance, a crucial dimension for some, favors the CX-30 with 8 inches compared to the CX-5’s 7.5 inches.
Mazda CX-30 vs. Mazda CX-5 Comparison
| Aspect | Mazda CX-30 | Mazda CX-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Legroom | 36.3 inches | 39.6 inches |
| Headroom | Comparable | Comparable |
| Shoulder Room | Comparable | Comparable |
| Hip Room | Comparable | Comparable |
| Ground Clearance | 8 inches | 7.5 inches |
| Cargo Space (Rear Seats Folded) | 45.2 cu. ft. | 59.6 cu. ft. |
Pros and Cons:
| Aspect | Mazda CX-30 | Mazda CX-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Pros | Compact size; Higher ground clearance | Superior rear legroom; Generous cargo space |
| Cons | Slightly limited rear legroom | Slightly lower ground clearance; Larger turning radius |
Cargo Space: While both models share similar interior passenger volume, the CX-5 outshines the CX-30 in cargo space. The CX-5 offers 59.6 cu. ft. when the rear seats are folded, compared to the CX-30’s 45.2 cu. ft.
This substantial difference allows the CX-5 to accommodate more luggage or belongings, making it a practical choice for those with a penchant for travel.
Mazda CX 30 vs CX 5 Interior
The interior of a vehicle is often a crucial aspect for prospective buyers, as it directly influences comfort, convenience, and overall driving experience.
Both the Mazda CX-30 and CX-5 showcase Mazda’s commitment to creating stylish and functional interiors, yet there are notable differences worth exploring.
Similarities:
- Power Tailgate: Both models feature a handy power tailgate for easy loading and unloading, making life a bit more convenient.
- Bose® Audio System: Enjoy a premium audio experience in both the CX-30 and CX-5, thanks to the inclusion of a Bose® audio system.
- Leather Upholstery: Embrace luxury with the option for leather upholstery in both vehicles, adding a touch of sophistication to the interior.
- Rain-Sensing Windshield Wipers: Stay safe in changing weather conditions with the convenience of rain-sensing windshield wipers, available in both models.
Differences:
- Infotainment Screen: The CX-30 boasts an 8.8-inch touch-screen, while the CX-5 goes bigger with a 10.25-inch display. If a larger screen is a priority, the CX-5 has you covered.
- Cold Climate Features: For those in colder climates, note that the CX-30 lacks heated mirrors and a heated steering wheel, features available in the CX-5 for added comfort in chilly weather.
Conclusion:
Choosing between the two models is a matter of personal preference. If you value a larger infotainment screen and extra cold weather comforts, the CX-5 might be your go-to.
However, if you prefer a more compact design with a slightly smaller screen, the CX-30 still offers a stylish and comfortable interior. Take a test drive at your local Mazda dealership to experience both and find the one that suits your style.
Mazda CX 30 vs CX 5 Price Comparison
Mazda CX-30 vs CX-5 Price Comparison
| Trim Level | Mazda CX-30 Price (MSRP) | Mazda CX-5 Price (MSRP) |
|---|---|---|
| 2.5 S | $22,050 | – |
| Select | $24,050 | – |
| Preferred | $26,450 | – |
| Premium | $28,700 | – |
| 2.5 Turbo | $30,050 | – |
| 2.5 Turbo Premium | $32,450 | – |
| 2.5 Turbo Premium Plus | $34,050 | – |
| Sport | – | $25,370 |
| Touring | – | $27,110 |
| Carbon Edition | – | $28,995 |
| Carbon Edition Turbo | – | $30,760 |
| Grand Touring | – | $30,560 |
| Grand Touring Reserve | – | $35,385 |
| Signature | – | $37,505 |
Prospective Buyer Considerations:
Mazda CX-30 vs CX-5 Performance and Safety Comparison
| Aspect | Mazda CX-30 | Mazda CX-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | SKYACTIV-G 2.5L Turbo (250 hp, 320 lb.-ft. torque) | SKYACTIV-G 2.5L Turbo (250 hp, 320 lb.-ft. torque) |
| Drivetrain Options | Front-Wheel Drive or i-ACTIV AWD | Front-Wheel Drive or i-ACTIV AWD (Standard in 2022) |
| Safety Features | Shared features, specific details may vary by trim | Blind-Spot Alert, Collision Warning System, Emergency & Security Services (Standard across all trims) |
| Additional Safety Features | Some safety features available in CX-5 not present in CX-30 | Advanced safety technologies included across all trims |
- Budget Constraints:
- If you’re working with a more restricted budget, the CX-30’s starting price point may be an attractive feature. The 2.5 S trim offers a compelling entry point for those mindful of their financial constraints.
- Desire for Higher Trims:
- For those seeking additional features and a more elevated driving experience, the CX-5’s range of trims, including the Carbon Edition Turbo and Signature, offers a broader selection catering to various preferences.
- Balancing Features and Price:
- The CX-30’s lineup provides a balance between affordability and features, making it an excellent choice for those who value essential amenities without breaking the bank.
- Consideration of Premium Features:
- If you prioritize premium features such as the Turbo engine and advanced technologies, exploring the higher trims of the CX-5 might align more closely with your preferences.
In the end, your choice between the Mazda CX-30 and CX-5 will depend on your budget, desired features, and the overall driving experience you’re seeking. Visit your local Mazda dealership to explore these models further and find the one that not only fits your budget but also fulfills your automotive aspirations.
Overall Comparison
Mazda CX-30 vs CX-5 Overall Comparison
| Aspect | Mazda CX-30 | Mazda CX-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | Compact; Slightly smaller | Midsize; Slightly larger |
| Interior | 8.8-inch touch screen; Compact cargo space | 10.25-inch touch screen; Spacious cargo area |
| Price (Starting MSRP) | Varies by trim; Starts at $22,050 | Varies by trim; Starts at $25,370 |
| Performance | SKYACTIV-G 2.5L Turbo (250 hp, 320 lb.-ft. torque); AWD optional | SKYACTIV-G 2.5L Turbo (250 hp, 320 lb.-ft. torque); AWD standard in 2022 |
| Safety Features | Shared features, specific details may vary by trim | Blind-Spot Alert, Collision Warning System, Emergency & Security Services (Standard across all trims) |
| Additional Safety Features | Some safety features available in CX-5 not present in CX-30 | Advanced safety technologies included across all trims |
Conclusion
The decision between the Mazda CX-30 and CX-5 ultimately hinges on individual preferences, priorities, and lifestyle considerations. Here’s a summary to assist you in making an informed choice:
Mazda CX-30:
- Pros:
- Compact size, ideal for urban driving.
- Stylish design with a modern aesthetic.
- Affordable entry point into the Mazda SUV lineup.
- Fuel-efficient for cost-effective driving.
- Agile handling, well-suited for city and suburban environments.
- Cons:
- Limited cargo space may pose challenges for those with extensive storage needs.
- Slightly limited rear legroom.
- Smaller infotainment screen size.
- Lacks some cold climate features.
- Engine options may be less powerful compared to larger SUVs.
Mazda CX-5:
- Pros:
- Spacious and comfortable interior, perfect for families.
- Generous cargo space for practical storage solutions.
- Premium design with Mazda’s signature KODO aesthetic.
- Advanced safety features standard across all trims.
- All-wheel drive becomes standard starting in 2022.
- Cons:
- Higher starting price compared to some competitors.
- Larger size may be less ideal for urban driving and parking.
- Moderate fuel efficiency, especially when compared to smaller vehicles.
- Some tech features may be limited to higher trims.
- Handling may be less agile compared to smaller SUVs.
Considerations:
- Budget: If budget is a primary concern, the CX-30’s more affordable starting price might be enticing.
- Space Requirements: For those needing more interior and cargo space, the CX-5 is the clear winner.
- Urban vs. Suburban Driving: The CX-30’s compact size is advantageous for urban settings, while the CX-5’s larger size caters well to suburban lifestyles.
- Tech Features: Evaluate the importance of tech features and consider which model provides the desired connectivity and infotainment options.
Ultimately, a test drive and a visit to the dealership can offer a firsthand experience of each model’s driving dynamics, features, and comfort. Both the Mazda CX-30 and CX-5 are exemplary SUVs, and the choice comes down to aligning the vehicle with your specific needs and preferences.
Frequently Asked Questions
The CX-30 is a compact SUV, while the CX-5 is classified as a midsize SUV. The CX-5 offers more interior space and a larger cargo area. Additionally, the CX-5 has a higher starting price and comes with standard all-wheel drive starting in 2022.
Both models come equipped with standard safety features such as Blind-Spot Alert, Collision Warning System, and Emergency & Security Services. The CX-5, across all trims, includes these features as standard, while specific details may vary for the CX-30 depending on the trim.
Yes, both models offer different trims with varying features and price points. The CX-30 has trims like 2.5 S, Select, Preferred, and Premium, while the CX-5 includes Sport, Touring, Carbon Edition, and higher-end trims like Grand Touring and Signature.
Yes, both models offer all-wheel drive options. The CX-5, starting in 2022, includes all-wheel drive as a standard feature across all trims.
Both models utilize the SKYACTIV-G 2.5L Turbo engine with similar fuel efficiency. The specific ratings may vary slightly based on factors like drivetrain and trim but generally fall within a competitive range for their respective segments.
