Table of contents
Ferrari Purosangue vs. Mazda CX-30 Comparison
| Feature | Ferrari Purosangue | Mazda CX-30 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions (mm) | Length: 4,973, Width: 2,028, Height: 1,589 | Length: 4,395, Width: 1,795, Height: 1,540 |
| Wheel Size | Large wheels | 215/65R16 tires or 215/55R18 tires |
Design and Interior:
- Ferrari Purosangue: Elegant Luxury, Practical Performance
The Ferrari Purosangue marks Ferrari’s debut in the world of four-door SUVs, challenging norms with rear-hinged doors for easy access while maintaining sleek aesthetics. Inside, it offers heated electric seats for four adults and a groundbreaking cavernous boot, redefining the SUV experience in a practical and versatile format.
- Mazda CX-30: Sleek Design, Everyday Practicality
Conversely, the Mazda CX-30 focuses on blending sleek design with everyday practicality. Its 8.8” display, Apple CarPlay, and spacious rear compartment cater to modern drivers. Safety features, including dual front airbags and i-ACTIVSENSE, make the CX-30 not just stylish but family-friendly.
Summary:
In summary, the Ferrari Purosangue and Mazda CX-30 offer distinct styles. The Purosangue combines luxury and practicality, while the CX-30 seamlessly integrates sleek design with everyday usability. The choice between them reflects individual priorities and driving aspirations.
| Feature | Ferrari Purosangue | Mazda CX-30 |
|---|---|---|
| Design | Four-door, four-seater with rear-hinged doors; compact form | Sleek design with emphasis on practicality |
| Interior Comfort | Heated electric seats for four adults; cavernous boot; foldable rear seats | Spacious interior; 8.8” display; Apple CarPlay |
| Performance | 0-100 km/h in 3.3 seconds; top speed > 310 km/h | SKYACTIV-G 4-cylinder engine; balanced power and efficiency |
| Dimensions (mm) | Length: 4,973, Width: 2,028, Height: 1,589 | Length: 4,395, Width: 1,795 |
| Weight Distribution | 49% front – 51% rear | Not specified |
| Safety Features | Anti-lock brakes, Stability control, Front-impact airbags, Pretensioners, Security system | Dual front airbags, i-ACTIVSENSE suite |
| Connectivity | MYFERRARI CONNECT | 8.8” display, Apple CarPlay |
| Practicality | Foldable rear seats for extra cargo space | Spacious rear compartment; family-friendly |
| Target Audience | Performance enthusiasts, luxury seekers | Modern drivers seeking practical elegance |
Performance
The Ferrari Purosangue boasts a potent power output of 715.07 bhp and a fuel efficiency rating of 12 MPG combined (11 MPG in the city and 15 MPG on the highway).
This indicates a high-performance engine but with a lower fuel efficiency compared to the Mazda CX-30, which features a more modest 153 HP and a fuel efficiency rating of 16.1 km/l.
The Mazda CX-30’s focus on practicality is evident in its automatic 6-speed transmission, while the Ferrari Purosangue, with its 4×4 transmission, emphasizes a dynamic driving experience with a 3.3-second 0-100 km/h acceleration and a top speed exceeding 310 km/h.
| Performance Feature | Ferrari Purosangue | Mazda CX-30 |
|---|---|---|
| Engine Layout | Mid-front engine | SKYACTIV-G 4-cylinder engine |
| Transmission | 4×4 transmission | SKYACTIV-Drive 6-speed automatic transmission |
| Weight Distribution | 49% front – 51% rear | Front: 1,010 kg (2,227 lbs) Rear: 895 kg (1,973 lbs) |
| Acceleration (0-100 km/h) | 3.3 seconds | 8.7 to 10.2 seconds |
| Top Speed | Exceeding 310 km/h | 116 mph |
| Power Output | 715.07 bhp | 153 HP |
| Fuel Efficiency Rating | 12 MPG combined (11 city / 15 highway) | 16.1 km/l |
I’d choose the Ferrari Purosangue because it’s more powerful with 715.07 bhp. However, keep in mind it has lower fuel efficiency (12 MPG) compared to the Mazda CX-30.
The decision leans towards a preference for high performance, but it’s essential to consider the trade-off in fuel efficiency.
Dimension & Features
| Feature | Ferrari Purosangue | Mazda CX-30 |
|---|---|---|
| Length (mm) | 4,973 | 4,395 |
| Width (mm) | 2,028 | 1,795 |
| Height (mm) | 1,589 | 1,540 |
| Wheel Size | Large wheels | 215/65R16 tires or 215/55R18 tires |
| Brakes | High-performance brakes | Smart Brake Support |
| Driving Position | Ergonomic for dynamic connection | Eye-line Zone |
| Design Philosophy | Style and substance | Urban-friendly and practical |
The Ferrari Purosangue presents a dynamic blend of style and substance, showcasing larger dimensions, high-performance brakes, and an ergonomic driving position.
In contrast, the Mazda CX-30 leans towards urban practicality with a more compact size, versatile wheel options, and safety features like Smart Brake Support.
The choice depends on one’s preference for a high-performance driving experience (Ferrari) or an urban-friendly, safety-focused option (Mazda). Always consider individual priorities when making this decision.
Pros & Cons of Ferrari Purosangue
Pros of Ferrari Purosangue:
- Exceptional Performance: Boasting 715.07 bhp and a 3.3-second 0-100 km/h acceleration, the Purosangue delivers unparalleled performance.
- Distinctive Design: Ferrari’s sports car DNA shines through in the unique four-door, four-seater configuration, breaking away from conventional SUV designs.
- Dynamic Driving: The mid-front engine layout and 4×4 transmission offer a balanced weight distribution, enhancing the car’s handling and dynamic capabilities.
- Luxurious Interior: The ergonomic driving position, heated electric seats, and spacious boot ensure a comfortable and practical driving experience.
- Visual Masterpiece: Large wheels, high-performance brakes, and imposing dimensions make the Purosangue a statement of style.
Cons of Ferrari Purosangue:
- Fuel Efficiency: With a fuel efficiency rating of 12 MPG combined, the high-performance nature sacrifices fuel economy.
- Limited Practicality: Despite being a four-door, four-seater, the Purosangue may lack the practicality and space found in traditional SUVs.
- High Price: As expected from Ferrari, the Purosangue likely comes with a significant price tag.
- Safety Features: Detailed safety features are not explicitly mentioned, raising questions about modern safety technologies.
Pros & Cons of Mazda CX-30
Pros of Mazda CX-30:
- Stylish Design: Modern and visually appealing.
- Responsive Handling: Agile for an enjoyable urban driving experience.
- Advanced Safety Features: Equipped with blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert.
- Comfortable Interior: Quality materials and an 8.8″ display for connectivity.
- Efficient Fuel Economy: Balances performance with economic operation.
Cons of Mazda CX-30:
- Limited Cargo Space: Might be restricting for extensive storage needs.
- Modest Engine Power: Suited for daily driving but not high-performance.
- Not for Off-Road Adventures: More suitable for on-road driving.
- Small Rear Window: Stylish design may affect rear visibility.
- Higher Trim Costs: Additional features in higher trims increase overall cost.
Frequently Asked Questions
The Mazda CX-30 is designed with efficient fuel economy in mind, providing a balanced mix of performance and economic operation compared to the Ferrari Purosangue.
The Mazda CX-30 is generally more cost-effective, offering a balance between features and affordability compared to the high-performance and luxury-oriented Ferrari Purosangue.
Consider your priorities – whether you value high-performance and luxury (Ferrari Purosangue) or a practical, urban-friendly SUV (Mazda CX-30). Test driving both is recommended to make an decision based on your preferences and needs.
The Purosangue challenges conventional SUV design with rear-hinged doors, emphasizing style and performance while maintaining practicality.
The Purosangue offers a dynamic driving experience with a mid-front engine layout, 4×4 transmission, and a unique 49:51 weight distribution for optimal performance.
The CX-30 is more geared towards on-road driving, lacking the rugged features needed for extensive off-road excursions.
