Hey Mazda fans! Today, we’re comparing the Mazda CX-5 2.5 S Premium AWD with its cousin, the Mazda CX-50 2.5 S Premium AWD. We’ll check out the power, size, and other cool features to help you decide which one suits your style.
Ready to roll? Let’s dive in!
Engine Comparison
Mazda CX-5 2.5 S Premium AWD | Mazda CX-50 2.5 S Premium AWD | |
---|---|---|
Engine Type | Regular Unleaded I-4 | Regular Unleaded I-4 |
Displacement | 2.5 L/152 | 2.5 L/152 |
Horsepower | 187 @ 6000 RPM | 187 @ 6000 RPM |
Torque | 186 @ 4000 RPM | 186 @ 4000 RPM |
Transmission | 6-Speed Automatic w/OD | 6-Speed Automatic w/OD |
When it comes to engine, both the Mazda CX-5 2.5 S Premium AWD and Mazda CX-50 2.5 S Premium AWD pack a punch with their 2.5 L/152 Regular Unleaded I-4 engines.
They share the same horsepower (187 @ 6000 RPM) and torque (186 @ 4000 RPM) stats, making them equally lively on the road. The 6-Speed Automatic Transmission with Overdrive in both models ensures smooth rides and efficient performance.
Transmission Comparison
Mazda CX-5 2.5 S Premium AWD | Mazda CX-50 2.5 S Premium AWD | |
---|---|---|
Transmission Type | 6-Speed Automatic with Overdrive (6-Speed Auto w/OD) | 6-Speed Automatic with Overdrive (6-Speed Auto w/OD) |
In terms of transmission, both the Mazda CX-5 and CX-50 are equipped with a 6-Speed Automatic Transmission featuring Overdrive (6-Speed Auto w/OD), ensuring smooth shifts and optimal driving performance.
Fuel Economy & Range Comparison
Mazda CX-5 2.5 S Premium AWD | Mazda CX-50 2.5 S Premium AWD | |
---|---|---|
EPA Fuel Economy (mpg) | 25 (combined) / 23 (city) / 29 (highway) | 27 (combined) / 24 (city) / 30 (highway) |
Range (miles, city/highway) | 351.90 / 443.70 | 381.60 / 477.00 |
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the Mazda CX-50 takes a slight lead over the CX-5. The CX-50 boasts an EPA combined rating of 27 mpg, outperforming the CX-5’s 25 mpg.
In practical terms, this means the CX-50 can cover more miles on a gallon of fuel. Both models offer an excellent range, making them suitable for various driving scenarios, from city commuting to extended highway journeys.
Interior & Exterior Dimensions
Mazda CX-5 2.5 S Premium AWD | Mazda CX-50 2.5 S Premium AWD | |
---|---|---|
Exterior Dimensions | ||
Length (inches) | 180.1 | 185.8 |
Width, without mirrors (inches) | 72.6 | 75.6 |
Height (inches) | 66.1 | 63.5 |
Interior Dimensions | ||
Passenger Volume (cubic feet) | 103.6 | 100.3 |
Front Head Room (inches) | 39.3 | 39.1 |
Front Leg Room (inches) | 41 | 41.7 |
Front Shoulder Room (inches) | 57.1 | 55.9 |
Front Hip Room (inches) | 55.2 | 53.6 |
Second Row Head Room (inches) | 39 | 38.6 |
Second Row Leg Room (inches) | 39.6 | 39.8 |
Second Row Shoulder Room (inches) | 54.8 | 53.6 |
Second Row Hip Room (inches) | 55.3 | 52.1 |
In comparing the exterior and interior dimensions, the Mazda CX-50 exhibits a larger overall length and width than the CX-5, contributing to a more spacious interior.
However, the CX-5 offers a slightly higher height. The CX-5 also provides a tad more front headroom and shoulder room.
Cargo Space Comparison
This table visually compares the cargo area and steering specifications of the Mazda CX-5 2.5 S Premium AWD and the Mazda CX-50 2.5 S Premium AWD.
Mazda CX-5 2.5 S Premium AWD | Mazda CX-50 2.5 S Premium AWD | |
---|---|---|
Cargo Area Dimensions | ||
Cargo Space/Area Length Behind First Row (inches) | NA | 75.4 |
Cargo Space/Area Length Behind Second Row (inches) | 37.4 | 42.6 |
Cargo Space/Area Width at Beltline (inches) | 56.9 | NA |
Cargo Bed Width Between Wheelhousings (inches) | 41.3 | NA |
Cargo Bed Height (inches) | 32.4 | 29.6 |
Cargo Space/Area Behind Front Row (cubic feet) | 59.3 | 56.3 |
Cargo Space/Area Behind Second Row (cubic feet) | 29.1 | 31.4 |
Steering | ||
Steering Type | Rack-Pinion | Rack-Pinion |
Steering Ratio (:1) | NA | NA |
Turns, lock to lock | NA | NA |
Turning Diameter / Radius, curb to curb (feet) | 36 | 36 |
When it comes to cargo space, the Mazda CX-50 has a roomier capacity, especially with its longer cargo space behind the first and second rows.
However, the CX-5 is a bit wider at the beltline. Both models have Rack-Pinion steering, providing responsive and controlled maneuverability with a turning diameter of 36 feet.
Choose the one that suits your cargo needs and steering preferences.
Wheels and Tires Comparison
Mazda CX-5 2.5 S Premium AWD | Mazda CX-50 2.5 S Premium AWD | |
---|---|---|
Front Wheels | 19 X 7 | 17 X 7 |
Front Wheel Material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Front Tire Size | P225/55VR19 | P225/65HR17 |
Rear Wheels | 19 X 7 | 17 X 7 |
Rear Wheel Material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Rear Tire Size | P225/55VR19 | P225/65HR17 |
Spare Wheel Size | Compact | Compact |
Spare Wheel Material | Steel | Steel |
Spare Tire Size | Compact | Compact |
In terms of wheels and tires, the Mazda CX-5 comes with larger 19 X 7 front wheels and P225/55VR19 tires, while the Mazda CX-50 features slightly smaller 17 X 7 front wheels with P225/65HR17 tires.
The CX-5 provides a sportier aesthetic with its larger wheel size, but the CX-50 may offer a bit more tire sidewall for a smoother ride.
Interior Comparison
Mazda CX-5 2.5 S Premium AWD | Mazda CX-50 2.5 S Premium AWD | |
---|---|---|
Passenger / Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
Total Passenger Volume (cubic feet) | 103.6 | 100.3 |
Front Head Room (inches) | 39.3 | 39.1 |
Front Leg Room (inches) | 41 | 41.7 |
Front Shoulder Room (inches) | 57.1 | 55.9 |
Front Hip Room (inches) | 55.2 | 53.6 |
Second Row Head Room (inches) | 39 | 38.6 |
Second Row Leg Room (inches) | 39.6 | 39.8 |
Second Row Shoulder Room (inches) | 54.8 | 53.6 |
Second Row Hip Room (inches) | 55.3 | 52.1 |
In terms of interior dimensions, both the Mazda CX-5 and CX-50 offer seating for five passengers, but there are subtle differences in space.
The CX-5 provides a bit more total passenger volume, headroom, and hip room in both the front and second rows. On the other hand, the CX-50 offers slightly more legroom in the front and second rows.
Depending on your preferences for spaciousness and specific passenger needs, you can make a choice that suits your lifestyle.
Entertainment System Comparison
Mazda CX-5 2.5 S Premium AWD | Mazda CX-50 2.5 S Premium AWD | |
---|---|---|
Infotainment Display Size | 10.25 inches | 8 inches |
Touchscreen Type | Touchscreen | Touchscreen |
Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
Android Auto | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth Connectivity | Yes | Yes |
USB Ports | Multiple | Multiple |
Navigation System | Yes | Yes |
Premium Audio System | Bose® | Bose® |
Both the Mazda CX-5 and CX-50 offer advanced entertainment systems to elevate your driving experience. The CX-5 stands out with a bigger 10.25-inch display, while the CX-50 has an 8-inch display.
Both models have a user-friendly touchscreen, support for Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, Bluetooth connectivity, multiple USB ports, and built-in navigation.
To top it off, both cars feature a premium Bose® audio system, ensuring top-notch sound quality on your drives. Your decision might hinge on your preference for display size and specific infotainment features.
Safety Features Comparison
Mazda CX-5 2.5 S Premium AWD | Mazda CX-50 2.5 S Premium AWD | |
---|---|---|
Adaptive Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
Lane Departure Warning | Yes | Yes |
Lane Keeping Assist | Yes | Yes |
Forward Collision Warning | Yes | Yes |
Automatic Emergency Braking | Yes | Yes |
Blind Spot Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
Rear Cross Traffic Alert | Yes | Yes |
360-Degree Camera System | No | Yes |
Parking Sensors (Front/Rear) | Rear | Yes |
Automatic High Beams | Yes | Yes |
Rain-Sensing Wipers | Yes | Yes |
Traction Control System | Yes | Yes |
Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
Airbags | Multiple | Multiple |
Both the Mazda CX-5 and CX-50 are equipped with a comprehensive set of safety features to ensure a secure driving experience.
These include adaptive cruise control, lane departure warning, lane-keeping assist, forward collision warning, automatic emergency braking, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, automatic high beams, rain-sensing wipers, and a traction control system.
The CX-50 goes a step further by offering a 360-degree camera system and front parking sensors, enhancing your awareness in various driving situations.
Both models prioritize safety with multiple airbags, stability control, and other advanced safety technologies.
Conclusion
In the comparison between the Mazda CX-5 2.5 S Premium AWD and the Mazda CX-50 2.5 S Premium AWD, both models showcase impressive features catering to different preferences and needs.
The CX-5 stands out with a more robust towing capacity and slightly larger cargo space behind the second row. It also boasts a sportier wheel size at 19 inches for a more dynamic appearance.
On the other hand, the CX-50 offers a more spacious interior with additional legroom in both the front and second rows. It excels in safety features, providing a 360-degree camera system, front parking sensors, and a slightly higher minimum ground clearance.
In terms of entertainment, both models are well-equipped, but the CX-5 offers a larger 10.25-inch infotainment display, providing a more immersive experience.
Ultimately, your choice between the CX-5 and CX-50 may hinge on your priorities. If towing capacity and cargo space are crucial, the CX-5 might be the ideal pick. For those valuing spacious interiors and advanced safety features, the CX-50 could be the preferred option.
Frequently Asked Questions
The Mazda CX-5 2.5 S Premium AWD starts at $35,275.
The Mazda CX-50 2.5 S Premium AWD is priced starting at $35,375.
Both the CX-5 and CX-50 are equipped with a Regular Unleaded I-4 engine, providing 187 horsepower at 6000 RPM.
Both models have a maximum towing capacity of 2000 pounds.
The CX-5 features a larger 10.25-inch infotainment display, while the CX-50 has an 8-inch display. Both models support Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, and come with a premium Bose® audio system.
The CX-50 provides a more spacious interior with additional legroom in both the front and second rows.
Both models include adaptive cruise control, lane departure warning, lane-keeping assist, forward collision warning, automatic emergency braking, blind spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, automatic high beams, rain-sensing wipers, traction control system, stability control, and multiple airbags.
The CX-50 stands out with a 360-degree camera system, front parking sensors, and a slightly higher minimum ground clearance.
2 comments
[…] Read – Mazda CX-5 vs Mazda CX-50 Specs […]
[…] Read – Mazda CX-5 vs Mazda CX-50 Specs […]