When it comes to choosing the perfect SUV, Mazda offers a diverse lineup, each with its own set of specifications and features. Two popular choices, the Mazda CX-30 and the Mazda CX-5, stand out in the competitive small SUV 4WD category.
In this comparison, we’ll look into the specs of the CX-30 2.5 S Preferred Package AWD and the CX-5 2.5 S Preferred Package AWD, helping you make an informed decision.
Table of contents
Engine and Performance Comparison: CX-30 vs. CX-5
When it comes to engine power and performance, both the Mazda CX-30 and CX-5 share a common engine type: the 2.5L SKYACTIV-G DOHC 16-Valve 4-Cylinder.
However, there are some nuanced differences between the two models that discerning drivers might want to consider.
Mazda CX-30 vs. CX-5 Comparison
| Specification | CX-30 2.5 S Preferred Package AWD | CX-5 2.5 S Preferred Package AWD |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Horsepower @ RPM | 191 @ 6000 | 187 @ 6000 |
| Maximum Torque @ RPM | 186 @ 4000 | 186 @ 4000 |
| Transmission | 6-Speed Automatic with OD | 6-Speed Automatic with OD |
CX-30 2.5 S Preferred Package AWD:
- Maximum Horsepower: 191 @ 6000 RPM
- Maximum Torque: 186 @ 4000 RPM
- Transmission: 6-Speed SKYACTIV-Drive Automatic with manual-shift mode and sport mode
- Fuel System: Gasoline Direct Injection
- Drivetrain: All-Wheel Drive
The CX-30 impresses with its robust 191 horsepower, providing a spirited driving experience. The torque delivery of 186 lb-ft at 4000 RPM ensures responsive acceleration, making it suitable for both city commutes and highway cruising. The 6-speed automatic transmission offers smooth gear shifts, contributing to an overall enjoyable driving experience.
CX-5 2.5 S Preferred Package AWD:
- Maximum Horsepower: 187 @ 6000 RPM
- Maximum Torque: 186 @ 4000 RPM
- Transmission: 6-Speed SKYACTIV-Drive Automatic with manual-shift mode and sport mode
- Fuel System: Gasoline Direct Injection
- Drivetrain: All-Wheel Drive
The CX-5 shares the same engine specifications as the CX-30 but with a slightly lower maximum horsepower of 187. However, it matches the CX-30 with 186 lb-ft of torque at 4000 RPM, ensuring a comparable level of acceleration and performance. The 6-speed automatic transmission with manual-shift mode and sport mode provides a dynamic driving experience.
Summary
While both models offer similar engine performance, the nuanced differences may be felt by drivers seeking a specific balance between power and efficiency.
The CX-30’s slightly higher horsepower may result in a marginally more dynamic driving experience, especially in situations requiring quick acceleration.
However, the CX-5, with its slightly lower horsepower, compensates with a longer driving range and ample torque, making it well-suited for longer journeys and varied terrains.
Read – Mazda CX-5 vs CX-50 2024 Dimensions, Price, Cargo Space & Reviews
Exterior Dimensions Comparison: Mazda CX-30 vs. Mazda CX-5
When it comes to choosing an SUV, exterior dimensions play a crucial role in determining how well the vehicle fits into your lifestyle and meets your preferences.
Exterior Dimensions Comparison: Mazda CX-30 vs. Mazda CX-5
| Exterior Dimension | Mazda CX-30 2.5 S Preferred Package AWD | Mazda CX-5 2.5 S Preferred Package AWD |
|---|---|---|
| Wheelbase (inches) | 104.4 | 106.2 |
| Length (inches) | 173 | 180.1 |
| Width, without mirrors (inches) | 70.7 | 72.6 |
| Height (inches) | 61.7 | 66.1 |
| Minimum Ground Clearance (inches) | 8 | 7.6 |
Implications for Your Choice:
- Urban Versatility vs. Enhanced Space: If you primarily navigate city streets and value easy parking, the CX-30’s compact dimensions might be a perfect fit. On the other hand, if you frequently embark on longer journeys or require more cargo space, the CX-5’s larger exterior could be advantageous.
- Aesthetic Preference: Exterior dimensions contribute significantly to a vehicle’s overall aesthetic. Consider whether you prefer the sportier, compact look of the CX-30 or the more substantial presence offered by the CX-5.
- Practical Considerations: Assess your daily driving needs. If you often find yourself in crowded urban areas, the CX-30’s nimble dimensions may offer a practical solution. However, if you prioritize a spacious interior for family trips or outdoor adventures, the CX-5’s larger footprint might be more appealing.
Read – Mazda CX 30 vs CX 5 – Dimensions, Interior, Reliability & Price
Interior Comfort and Space
Mazda CX-30 vs. Mazda CX-5 Comparison
| Feature | Mazda CX-30 2.5 S Preferred Package AWD | Mazda CX-5 2.5 S Preferred Package AWD |
|---|---|---|
| Price Starting At | $30,165 | $32,025 |
| EPA Classification | Small SUV 4WD | Small SUV 4WD |
| Engine Type | Regular Unleaded I-4 | Regular Unleaded I-4 |
| Maximum Horsepower @ RPM | 191 @ 6000 | 187 @ 6000 |
| Maximum Torque @ RPM | 186 @ 4000 | 186 @ 4000 |
| Fuel Economy (mpg) | 29 / 26 / 33 (Combined/City/Highway) | 25 / 23 / 29 (Combined/City/Highway) |
| Total Passenger Volume (cubic feet) | 93.8 | 103.6 |
| Cargo Space Behind Front Row (cubic feet) | 45.2 | 59.3 |
| Wheelbase (inches) | 104.4 | 106.2 |
| Minimum Ground Clearance (inches) | 8 | 7.6 |
The interior of both the Mazda CX-30 and CX-5 models is designed to provide a comfortable and spacious environment for occupants. Let’s delve into the key aspects of interior comfort and space for both vehicles.
Mazda CX-30 2.5 S Preferred Package AWD:
- The CX-30 accommodates up to five passengers comfortably.
- The total passenger volume is impressive, measuring at 93.8 cubic feet, ensuring ample space for all occupants.
- Front passengers can enjoy 37.8 inches of headroom, 41.7 inches of legroom, and 55.6 inches of shoulder room.
- The rear seats provide a generous 38.3 inches of headroom, 36.3 inches of legroom, and 53.6 inches of shoulder room.
- The CX-30 offers a practical side with 45.2 cubic feet of cargo space behind the front row, adding versatility to its interior design.
Mazda CX-5 2.5 S Preferred Package AWD:
- Similar to the CX-30, the CX-5 comfortably seats up to five occupants.
- The total passenger volume is even more expansive, measuring at 103.6 cubic feet, providing a roomy atmosphere for everyone inside.
- Front headroom in the CX-5 is 39.3 inches, with 41 inches of legroom and 57.1 inches of shoulder room.
- Rear passengers enjoy 39 inches of headroom, 39.6 inches of legroom, and 54.8 inches of shoulder room.
- The CX-5 boasts 59.3 cubic feet of cargo space behind the front row, offering practicality without compromising on comfort.
In conclusion, both the Mazda CX-30 and CX-5 prioritize interior comfort and space, making them suitable choices for those who value a well-designed and accommodating cabin.
Depending on your preferences for space and cargo capacity, you can choose between the compact yet versatile CX-30 or the more spacious CX-5.
Read – Mazda CX-5 vs Mazda CX-50 Specs
Steering and Suspension Comparison: Mazda CX-30 vs. Mazda CX-5
Both the Mazda CX-30 2.5 S Preferred Package AWD and the Mazda CX-5 2.5 S Preferred Package AWD are equipped with advanced steering and suspension systems, contributing to a dynamic driving experience.
Following is the comparison in table:
| Feature | Mazda CX-30 2.5 S Preferred Package AWD | Mazda CX-5 2.5 S Preferred Package AWD |
|---|---|---|
| Price Starting At | $30,165 | $32,025 |
| EPA Classification | Small SUV 4WD | Small SUV 4WD |
| Drivetrain | All Wheel Drive | All Wheel Drive |
| Engine Type | Regular Unleaded I-4 | Regular Unleaded I-4 |
| Displacement (liters/cubic inches) | 2.5 L/152 | 2.5 L/152 |
| Maximum Horsepower @ RPM | 191 @ 6000 | 187 @ 6000 |
| Maximum Torque @ RPM | 186 @ 4000 | 186 @ 4000 |
| Transmission Type | Automatic w/OD | Automatic w/OD |
| Number of Transmission Speeds | 6 | 6 |
| Fuel Economy (mpg) | 29 (combined) / 26 (city) / 33 (highway) | 25 (combined) / 23 (city) / 29 (highway) |
| Turning Diameter / Radius (feet) | 34.8 | 36 |
| Front Suspension Type | Strut | Strut |
| Rear Suspension Type | Torsion Beam | Multi-Link |
| Front Brake Rotors (inches) | 11.6 | 11.7 |
| Rear Brake Rotors (inches) | 11.9 | 11.9 |
- Both models feature Rack-Pinion steering systems for responsive and precise control.
- The CX-30 boasts a slightly smaller turning radius (34.8 feet) compared to the CX-5 (36 feet), potentially offering better maneuverability in tight spaces.
- In terms of suspension, the CX-30 utilizes a Torsion Beam rear suspension, while the CX-5 features a more advanced Multi-Link setup, which can contribute to enhanced stability and handling.
- Both models are equipped with 4-Wheel Disc brakes and an Anti-Lock Braking System for effective and safe braking performance.
In summary, while the CX-30 may offer a slightly tighter turning radius, the CX-5 incorporates a more sophisticated Multi-Link rear suspension, potentially providing a more refined ride and handling experience.
Fuel Economy Comparison
Efficiency is a key consideration for many drivers, and both the Mazda CX-30 and CX-5 offer commendable fuel economy. Let’s delve into the fuel efficiency specifications for these two models.
Read – Cargo Space and Interior Dimensions of the 2021 Mazda CX-30
Mazda CX-30:
- EPA Fuel Economy (Combined/City/Highway): 29/26/33 mpg
- EPA Greenhouse Gas Score: Not Available
- CO2 Emissions, 15K mi/year: 6.1 tons
- Range, City/Highway: 330.20/419.10 miles
- Fuel Tank Capacity: 12.7 gallons
The CX-30’s efficient performance, with a combined fuel economy of 29 mpg, makes it an excellent choice for those seeking a balance between power and fuel efficiency. The compact SUV’s green credentials are reflected in its low CO2 emissions, contributing to a more environmentally friendly driving experience.
Mazda CX-5:
- EPA Fuel Economy (Combined/City/Highway): 25/23/29 mpg
- EPA Greenhouse Gas Score: 5.0
- CO2 Emissions, 15K mi/year: 7.1 tons
- Range, City/Highway: 351.90/443.70 miles
- Fuel Tank Capacity: 15.3 gallons
While the CX-5 offers a slightly lower combined fuel economy of 25 mpg, it compensates with a larger fuel tank capacity. This results in an extended driving range, making it a suitable choice for those who frequently embark on longer journeys.
In summary, both the CX-30 and CX-5 deliver fuel-efficient performance, allowing drivers to make choices based on their driving habits, environmental considerations, and preferences for a particular model.
Pricing Comparison
One of the crucial factors influencing a car-buying decision is the price, and both the Mazda CX-30 and CX-5 offer competitive pricing with various packages to cater to different preferences. Let’s break down the pricing details for each model.
| Model | Trim Level | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|
| Mazda CX-30 | 2.5 S Preferred Package AWD | $30,165 |
| Mazda CX-5 | 2.5 S Preferred Package AWD | $32,025 |
In comparing the two, the CX-30 stands out as a more budget-friendly option, making it an excellent choice for cost-conscious consumers. However, for those willing to invest a bit more for additional space and features, the CX-5 offers a compelling package.
Safety Comparison
Ensuring the safety of occupants is a top priority for Mazda, and both the CX-30 and CX-5 come equipped with advanced safety features. Let’s explore the safety specifications of these models to help you make better choice.
Mazda CX-30:
- Overall Safety Rating: 5/5
- Frontal Barrier Crash Rating (Driver/Passenger): 5/5
- Side Crash Rating: 5/5
- Side Barrier Rating (Driver/Passenger Rear Seat): 5/5
- Side Pole Rating (Driver Front Seat): 5/5
- Rollover Rating: 4/5
The CX-30 boasts an impressive overall safety rating of 5/5, reflecting its commitment to providing a secure driving experience. High ratings in individual crash scenarios, including frontal and side impacts, demonstrate the model’s robust safety structure.
Mazda CX-5:
- Overall Safety Rating: 5/5
- Frontal Barrier Crash Rating (Driver/Passenger): 5/5
- Side Crash Rating: 5/5
- Side Barrier Rating (Driver/Passenger Rear Seat): 5/5
- Side Pole Rating (Driver Front Seat): 5/5
- Rollover Rating: 4/5
Similarly, the CX-5 achieves an overall safety rating of 5/5, indicating its commitment to passenger safety. Consistent high ratings across various crash scenarios highlight the effectiveness of its safety features and structural design.
In conclusion, both the CX-30 and CX-5 prioritize safety, with identical overall safety ratings and strong performance in individual crash tests.
Whether you choose the compact CX-30 or the slightly larger CX-5, you can trust in Mazda’s dedication to providing a secure driving environment for you and your passengers.
Read – 2023 Mazda cx-50 Configurations (All Trims)
Conclusion
So, when it comes down to it, choosing between the Mazda CX-30 and CX-5 is like picking your favorite flavor of ice cream – it depends on what you like!
Mazda CX-30:
- Cute and Compact: The CX-30 is like the little sibling – small, easy to handle, and great for zipping around town.
- Gas Saver: It sips gas, giving you more miles for your money with an estimated 29 miles per gallon.
- Friendly Price: It’s a budget-friendly choice, starting at $30,165, making it a sweet deal.
Mazda CX-5:
- Room for Everyone: If you need more space for friends, family, or stuff, the CX-5 is your go-to. It’s roomier inside and has more power under the hood.
- Power Boost: It’s a bit more powerful, which means it can handle the road with a bit more oomph.
- Still Safe: Both cars are super safe, so you’re in good hands no matter which one you go for.
Deciding Time:
- City Slicker or Adventure Seeker: If you love city life and want to save on gas, the CX-30 is like your city buddy. If you’re all about space and power, the CX-5 is your adventure sidekick.
- Budget Check: The CX-30 is a wallet-friendly choice, while the CX-5 offers a bit more with a slightly higher starting price.
No matter which Mazda you go for, you’re getting a stylish, safe, and fun ride. Head to your local Mazda dealer, take them for a spin, and pick the one that feels just right for you! Happy driving! 🚗✨