Neftin Westlake Mazda
Image default
Car Comparison

Ferrari SUV vs Mazda cx-30 2024 Comparison

Ferrari Purosangue vs. Mazda CX-30 Comparison

Ferrari Purosangue vs. Mazda CX-30 Comparison

FeatureFerrari PurosangueMazda CX-30
Dimensions (mm)Length: 4,973, Width: 2,028, Height: 1,589Length: 4,395, Width: 1,795, Height: 1,540
Wheel SizeLarge wheels215/65R16 tires or 215/55R18 tires

Design and Interior:

Ferrari SUV vs Mazda cx-30
Ferrari SUV vs Mazda cx-30
  • Ferrari Purosangue: Elegant Luxury, Practical Performance

The Ferrari Purosangue marks Ferrari’s debut in the world of four-door SUVs, challenging norms with rear-hinged doors for easy access while maintaining sleek aesthetics. Inside, it offers heated electric seats for four adults and a groundbreaking cavernous boot, redefining the SUV experience in a practical and versatile format.

  • Mazda CX-30: Sleek Design, Everyday Practicality

Conversely, the Mazda CX-30 focuses on blending sleek design with everyday practicality. Its 8.8” display, Apple CarPlay, and spacious rear compartment cater to modern drivers. Safety features, including dual front airbags and i-ACTIVSENSE, make the CX-30 not just stylish but family-friendly.


In summary, the Ferrari Purosangue and Mazda CX-30 offer distinct styles. The Purosangue combines luxury and practicality, while the CX-30 seamlessly integrates sleek design with everyday usability. The choice between them reflects individual priorities and driving aspirations.

FeatureFerrari PurosangueMazda CX-30
DesignFour-door, four-seater with rear-hinged doors; compact formSleek design with emphasis on practicality
Interior ComfortHeated electric seats for four adults; cavernous boot; foldable rear seatsSpacious interior; 8.8” display; Apple CarPlay
Performance0-100 km/h in 3.3 seconds; top speed > 310 km/hSKYACTIV-G 4-cylinder engine; balanced power and efficiency
Dimensions (mm)Length: 4,973, Width: 2,028, Height: 1,589Length: 4,395, Width: 1,795
Weight Distribution49% front – 51% rearNot specified
Safety FeaturesAnti-lock brakes, Stability control, Front-impact airbags, Pretensioners, Security systemDual front airbags, i-ACTIVSENSE suite
ConnectivityMYFERRARI CONNECT8.8” display, Apple CarPlay
PracticalityFoldable rear seats for extra cargo spaceSpacious rear compartment; family-friendly
Target AudiencePerformance enthusiasts, luxury seekersModern drivers seeking practical elegance
Design and Interior Ferrari SUV vs Mazda cx-30


Performance - Ferrari SUV vs Mazda cx-30
Performance – Ferrari SUV vs Mazda cx-30

The Ferrari Purosangue boasts a potent power output of 715.07 bhp and a fuel efficiency rating of 12 MPG combined (11 MPG in the city and 15 MPG on the highway).

This indicates a high-performance engine but with a lower fuel efficiency compared to the Mazda CX-30, which features a more modest 153 HP and a fuel efficiency rating of 16.1 km/l.

The Mazda CX-30’s focus on practicality is evident in its automatic 6-speed transmission, while the Ferrari Purosangue, with its 4×4 transmission, emphasizes a dynamic driving experience with a 3.3-second 0-100 km/h acceleration and a top speed exceeding 310 km/h.

Performance FeatureFerrari PurosangueMazda CX-30
Engine LayoutMid-front engineSKYACTIV-G 4-cylinder engine
Transmission4×4 transmissionSKYACTIV-Drive 6-speed automatic transmission
Weight Distribution49% front – 51% rearFront: 1,010 kg (2,227 lbs) Rear: 895 kg (1,973 lbs)
Acceleration (0-100 km/h)3.3 seconds8.7 to 10.2 seconds
Top SpeedExceeding 310 km/h116 mph
Power Output715.07 bhp153 HP
Fuel Efficiency Rating12 MPG combined (11 city / 15 highway)16.1 km/l
Performance – Ferrari SUV vs Mazda cx-30

I’d choose the Ferrari Purosangue because it’s more powerful with 715.07 bhp. However, keep in mind it has lower fuel efficiency (12 MPG) compared to the Mazda CX-30.

The decision leans towards a preference for high performance, but it’s essential to consider the trade-off in fuel efficiency.

Dimension & Features

FeatureFerrari PurosangueMazda CX-30
Length (mm)4,9734,395
Width (mm)2,0281,795
Height (mm)1,5891,540
Wheel SizeLarge wheels215/65R16 tires or 215/55R18 tires
BrakesHigh-performance brakesSmart Brake Support
Driving PositionErgonomic for dynamic connectionEye-line Zone
Design PhilosophyStyle and substanceUrban-friendly and practical
Dimension & Features: Ferrari SUV vs Mazda cx-30

The Ferrari Purosangue presents a dynamic blend of style and substance, showcasing larger dimensions, high-performance brakes, and an ergonomic driving position.

In contrast, the Mazda CX-30 leans towards urban practicality with a more compact size, versatile wheel options, and safety features like Smart Brake Support.

The choice depends on one’s preference for a high-performance driving experience (Ferrari) or an urban-friendly, safety-focused option (Mazda). Always consider individual priorities when making this decision.

Pros & Cons of Ferrari Purosangue

Pros of Ferrari Purosangue:

  1. Exceptional Performance: Boasting 715.07 bhp and a 3.3-second 0-100 km/h acceleration, the Purosangue delivers unparalleled performance.
  2. Distinctive Design: Ferrari’s sports car DNA shines through in the unique four-door, four-seater configuration, breaking away from conventional SUV designs.
  3. Dynamic Driving: The mid-front engine layout and 4×4 transmission offer a balanced weight distribution, enhancing the car’s handling and dynamic capabilities.
  4. Luxurious Interior: The ergonomic driving position, heated electric seats, and spacious boot ensure a comfortable and practical driving experience.
  5. Visual Masterpiece: Large wheels, high-performance brakes, and imposing dimensions make the Purosangue a statement of style.

Cons of Ferrari Purosangue:

  1. Fuel Efficiency: With a fuel efficiency rating of 12 MPG combined, the high-performance nature sacrifices fuel economy.
  2. Limited Practicality: Despite being a four-door, four-seater, the Purosangue may lack the practicality and space found in traditional SUVs.
  3. High Price: As expected from Ferrari, the Purosangue likely comes with a significant price tag.
  4. Safety Features: Detailed safety features are not explicitly mentioned, raising questions about modern safety technologies.

Pros & Cons of Mazda CX-30

Pros of Mazda CX-30:

  1. Stylish Design: Modern and visually appealing.
  2. Responsive Handling: Agile for an enjoyable urban driving experience.
  3. Advanced Safety Features: Equipped with blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert.
  4. Comfortable Interior: Quality materials and an 8.8″ display for connectivity.
  5. Efficient Fuel Economy: Balances performance with economic operation.

Cons of Mazda CX-30:

  1. Limited Cargo Space: Might be restricting for extensive storage needs.
  2. Modest Engine Power: Suited for daily driving but not high-performance.
  3. Not for Off-Road Adventures: More suitable for on-road driving.
  4. Small Rear Window: Stylish design may affect rear visibility.
  5. Higher Trim Costs: Additional features in higher trims increase overall cost.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the fuel efficiency of the Mazda CX-30 compare to the Ferrari Purosangue?

The Mazda CX-30 is designed with efficient fuel economy in mind, providing a balanced mix of performance and economic operation compared to the Ferrari Purosangue.

Which model is more cost-effective, the Ferrari Purosangue or Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is generally more cost-effective, offering a balance between features and affordability compared to the high-performance and luxury-oriented Ferrari Purosangue.

What should I consider when choosing between these two models?

Consider your priorities – whether you value high-performance and luxury (Ferrari Purosangue) or a practical, urban-friendly SUV (Mazda CX-30). Test driving both is recommended to make an decision based on your preferences and needs.

How does the Ferrari Purosangue’s design differ from traditional SUVs?

The Purosangue challenges conventional SUV design with rear-hinged doors, emphasizing style and performance while maintaining practicality.

What is the driving experience like in the Ferrari Purosangue?

The Purosangue offers a dynamic driving experience with a mid-front engine layout, 4×4 transmission, and a unique 49:51 weight distribution for optimal performance.

Is the Mazda CX-30 suitable for off-road adventures?

The CX-30 is more geared towards on-road driving, lacking the rugged features needed for extensive off-road excursions.

Related posts

Mazda CX-5 vs CX-50 2024 Dimensions, Price, Cargo Space & Reviews


Crew Cab vs Extended Cab: Choosing the Right Pickup Truck for Your Needs


Hyundai Santa fe vs Mazda CX 5, Price, Specs, Cargo Space & Reliability


Leave a Comment